Ƶ

North Korea pledges deeper ties with Russia as security chief visits

North Korea pledges deeper ties with Russia as security chief visits
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, meets with a delegation led by Sergei Shoigu, Secretary of the Security Council of Russia. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 14 September 2024

North Korea pledges deeper ties with Russia as security chief visits

North Korea pledges deeper ties with Russia as security chief visits
  • Western powers have accused cash-strapped North Korea of selling ammunition to Russia
  • North Korea has recently bolstered military ties with Russia

SEOUL: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un pledged to deepen ties with Russia as he held talks with visiting security chief Sergei Shoigu, state media reported Saturday.
Western powers have accused cash-strapped North Korea of selling ammunition to Russia in defiance of sanctions over the more than 30-month war in Ukraine.
North Korea has recently bolstered military ties with Russia, with President Vladimir Putin making a rare visit to Pyongyang in June, where he signed a mutual defense agreement with Kim.
Pictures in North Korean state media showed Kim and Shoigu hugging and smiling at the end of their visit, with the North Korean leader “wishing the respected President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin good health and success in his work.”
The pair were described as having had “constructive” talks in “a friendly and trustworthy, warm atmosphere.”
The exact location of their meeting was not disclosed, but experts suspect it was the Kumsusan Guest Palace in Pyongyang, which has hosted both Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping.
“There was a wide exchange of views on the issues of steadily deepening the strategic dialogue between the two countries and strengthening cooperation to defend the mutual security interests and on the regional and international situation,” North Korean state media said.
Kim “affirmed that the DPRK government would further expand cooperation and collaboration” with Russia based on the treaty they signed in June, it added, using the country’s official name.
Russia’s security council said on its website that Shoigu’s meeting with Kim will “make an important contribution to the implementation” of the defense pact.
Shoigu heads Russia’s Security Council after stepping down as defense minister in May.
He last met with Kim in July 2023, during a celebration in Pyongyang for the 70th anniversary of the 1953 Korean War armistice.
Their latest meeting comes two days after North Korea fired multiple short-range ballistic missiles into waters east of the Korean peninsula. Seoul’s Joint Chiefs of Staff said the testing spree was possibly of weapons meant “for export to Russia.”
On Friday, North Korea released images of its uranium enrichment facility for the first time, and Kim stressed “the need to further augment the number of centrifuges in order to exponentially increase the nuclear weapons for self-defense.”
The United States and South Korea have accused North Korea of supplying ammunition and missiles for Russia’s war effort, a claim Pyongyang has called “absurd.”
A Conflict Armament Research report this week used debris analysis to show “that missiles produced this year in North Korea are being used in Ukraine.”
Russia, a historical ally of North Korea, is one of a handful of nations with which Pyongyang maintains friendly relations. Ties have warmed since the 2022 start of the Ukraine war ruptured Russia’s relations with the West.


Media reports put Russian military death toll at 70,000

Updated 26 sec ago

Media reports put Russian military death toll at 70,000

Media reports put Russian military death toll at 70,000
Warsaw: The BBC and the independent Russian news site Mediazona said on Friday they had documented the deaths of around 70,000 Russian soldiers since the start of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
The toll comes from publicly available information such as official statements, death notices in the media and announcements on social media, as well as tombstones in Russian cemeteries.
“We have identified the names of 70,112 Russian soldiers killed in Ukraine but the actual number is believed to be considerably higher,” the BBC said.
“Some families do not share details of their relatives’ deaths publicly — and our analysis does not include names we were unable to check, or the deaths of militia in Russian-occupied Donetsk and Luhansk in eastern Ukraine,” the British broadcaster added.
The same two organizations had put the toll at 66,000 in mid-August.
Mediazona and another independent Russian news site, Meduza, have also analyzed official data from notaries on inheritance cases.
This has led them to estimate that the military death toll could be much higher — at 120,000.
The toll is considered secret in Russia.
Ukraine also communicates very little about losses for fear of demoralizing its citizens after more than two and a half years of Russia’s invasion.
In February, President Volodymyr Zelensky said around 31,000 Ukrainian soldiers had died, although analysts and observers have said they believe the real number to be much higher.
The Wall Street Journal reported this week that the war had killed or injured a total of one million soldiers on both sides.
“A confidential Ukrainian estimate from earlier this year put the number of dead Ukrainian troops at 80,000 and the wounded at 400,000, according to people familiar with the matter.
“Western intelligence estimates of Russian casualties vary, with some putting the number of dead as high as nearly 200,000 and wounded at around 400,000,” it said.

Sri Lankans ready for first presidential vote since economic collapse

Sri Lankans ready for first presidential vote since economic collapse
Updated 21 min 29 sec ago

Sri Lankans ready for first presidential vote since economic collapse

Sri Lankans ready for first presidential vote since economic collapse
  • About 17 million out of Sri Lanka’s 22 million people are eligible to vote
  • Political polarization in Saturday’s election is highest in decades

COLOMBO: Sri Lanka will hold its presidential election on Saturday in a vote that will decide the future of the South Asian nation struggling to recover from its financial collapse in 2022, which spurred a popular uprising and drove former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa from power.

In the two years since the worst crisis in history hit the country and Rajapaksa fled, his successor, current President Ranil Wickremesinghe, has managed to introduce policy reforms to obtain an International Monetary Fund bailout.

While the austerity measures he introduced — including tax hikes — eased the shortage of essentials such as food, fuel, and medicines, they did not help his popularity.

Wickremesinghe, 75, will nevertheless be among the main figures in the election running as an independent candidate.

A six-time prime minister belonging to the old guard, which Sri Lankans blame for the 2022 crisis, he will compete with over 30 candidates running for office. Among them are Anura Kumara Dissanayake, 55, the leader of a Marxist-led coalition National People’s Power, and Sajith Premadasa, 57, Wickremesinghe’s former deputy and the leader of the largest opposition party, the United People’s Power.

“The election is significant because there is a degree of ideological polarization that we have never seen in a Sri Lankan election, at least since pre-independence really, (since) 1947,” Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka, academic and Sri Lanka’s former envoy to the UN, told Arab News.

Elections have traditionally been contested between coalitions of center-right and center-left parties but in the upcoming vote, competition will involve a boarder political spectrum.

“The sitting president is a right-wing conservative, Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe. And the main challenger is the leader of the opposition, Mr. Sajid Premadasa, who has repeatedly called himself a social democrat,” Jayatilleka said.

“He’s a moderate progressive of a centrist nature, running against a sitting right-wing president, on the one hand, and a former revolutionary, still Marxist-Leninist, Anura Kumara Dissanayake … on the other. This is very, very new for Sri Lanka.”

The fourth main contender is Namal Rajapaksa, the 38-year-old heir apparent to the Rajapaksa and the son of Mahinda Rajapaksa — Gotabaya’s brother who had served several terms both as Sri Lanka’s president and prime minister.

“Namal Rajapaksa is running for the presidency now, but he’s a serious contender for the presidency next time, in five years,” Jayatilleka said.

“This is a trial run … It’s aimed to retain the vote base of the Rajapaksas and their party, the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (Sri Lanka People’s Front) and prevent that vote from going with certain ministers of their party, who have defected to the side of President Wickremesinghe.”

Sri Lanka has a presidential system, in which the president heads the government and can appoint and dismiss the prime minister and the other ministers.

Almost 17 million of the island nation’s 22 million people are eligible to take part in Saturday’s vote, where they can select three candidates from the ballot paper.

The first preferences will be counted first and the candidate who secures more than 50 percent of the valid votes will win. If there is no clear winner, the first two candidates will be retained, and the ballot papers will be checked again to see if either of them was a second or third preference.

Those votes will be added to the tally of the two candidates and the one who receives the highest number will be declared the winner.

While the country’s economy is the key issue in the election, Dr. B.A. Husseinmiya, a Sri Lankan historian and former professor at the University of Brunei Darussalam, said there is also a need for change due to public disillusionment with mainstream politicians.

The mass protest movement that erupted in 2022 against then-president Rajapaksa and his prime minister brother, and forced both to quit, was what gave rise to the leftist National People’s Power.

“It’s a most historic occasion when an underdog like the NPP emerges so fast, which is (the result of) all the mistakes the past regimes have made,” Husseinmiya told Arab News.

“I think people everywhere are coming to believe that change is very important if you want to move forward.”


Taiwan and Bulgaria deny links to exploding pagers in Lebanon

Taiwan and Bulgaria deny links to exploding pagers in Lebanon
Updated 20 September 2024

Taiwan and Bulgaria deny links to exploding pagers in Lebanon

Taiwan and Bulgaria deny links to exploding pagers in Lebanon
  • Pager, radio detonations killed 37, wounded thousands in Lebanon
  • Investigations underway to find out how pagers detonated

TAIPEI: Authorities in Taiwan and Bulgaria on Friday denied involvement in the supply chain of thousands of pagers that detonated on Tuesday in Lebanon in a deadly blow to Hezbollah.
Tuesday’s attack, and another on Wednesday involving exploding hand-held radios used by Hezbollah, together killed 37 people and wounded about 3,000 in Lebanon.
How or when the pagers were weaponized and remotely detonated remains a public mystery and the hunt for answers has involved Taiwan, Bulgaria, Norway and Romania.
Security sources said Israel was responsible for the pager explosions that raised the stakes in a growing conflict between the two sides. Israel has not directly commented on the attacks.
Taiwan-based Gold Apollo said this week it did not manufacture the devices used in the attack, and that Hungary-based company BAC to which the pagers were traced had a license to use its brand.
“The components are (mainly) low-end IC (integrated circuits) and batteries,” Taiwan’s Economy Minister Kuo Jyh-huei told reporters.
When pressed on whether the parts in the pagers that exploded were made in Taiwan, he said, “I can say with certainty they were not made in Taiwan,” adding the case is being investigated by judicial authorities.
Taiwan’s Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung, also speaking to reporters at parliament, answered “no” when asked if he had met with the de facto Israeli ambassador to express concern about the case.
“We are asking our missions abroad to raise their security awareness and will exchange relevant information with other countries.”
Bulgaria also became a focal point for investigations on Thursday after local media reported that Sofia-based Norta Global Ltd. was involved in selling the pagers.
But Bulgaria’s state security agency DANS said on Friday it had “indisputably established” that no pagers used in the Lebanon attack were imported to, exported from, or made in Bulgaria.
It said neither Norta nor its Norwegian owner had traded, sold or bought the pagers within Bulgaria’s jurisdiction.
Taiwan Probe
As Taiwanese authorities look into any potential link between its sprawling global tech supply chains and the devices used in the attacks in Lebanon, Gold Apollo’s president and founder, Hsu Ching-kuang, was questioned by prosecutors late into the night on Thursday, then released.
Another person also at the prosecutors’ office was Teresa Wu, the sole employee of a company called Apollo System, who did not speak to reporters as she left late on Thursday.
Hsu said this week a person called Teresa had been one of his contacts for the deal with BAC.
Photos posted to Gold Apollo’s official Facebook page showed Teresa Wu at a Singapore trade show in 2016 wearing a Gold Apollo lanyard. Reuters was unable to contact Wu for comment.
A spokesperson for the Shilin District Prosecutors Office in Taipei told Reuters that it had questioned two people as witnesses and was given consent to conduct searches of their firms’ four locations in Taiwan as part of its investigation.
“We’ll seek to determine if there was any possible involvement of these Taiwanese companies as soon as possible, to ensure the safety of the country and its people,” the spokesperson said.
Iran-aligned Hezbollah has vowed to retaliate against Israel, which has not claimed responsibility for the detonations. The two sides have been engaged in cross-border warfare since conflict in Gaza erupted last October.


France set to finally get new government

France set to finally get new government
Updated 20 September 2024

France set to finally get new government

France set to finally get new government
  • Politics in France has been deadlocked since the June-July snap legislative elections left it with a hung parliament

Paris: French President Emmanuel Macron was on Friday weighing a new government proposed by Prime Minister Michel Barnier which includes new faces in almost all key posts and marks a fresh shift to the right.
The full cabinet line-up was due to be announced later Friday or by Sunday at the latest, multiple sources told AFP, ending two-and-a-half months of deadlock created by inconclusive legislative elections that wrapped up in July.
While there appeared to be no major surprises or big name entrants into the cabinet, there are set to be new foreign, economy and interior ministers, with only the defense minister remaining unchanged among the key offices of state.
Barnier is proposing Europe Minister Jean-Noel Barrot as foreign minister, a source close to Macron’s political faction, asking not to be named, told AFP.
The move would be a major promotion for the 41-year-old, whose slick media appearances have impressed observers, but he would face the challenge of boosting France’s presence on the international stage.
Meanwhile Bruno Retailleau, who heads the faction of the right-wing The Republicans (LR) in France’s upper house Senate, is to take on the interior ministry, according to several sources who spoke to AFP.
Landing the interior ministry, which oversees the police and domestic security, would be seen as a major success for the right.
And another meteoric rise will see Antoine Armand, 33, the head of parliament’s economic affairs commission installed as economy minister.
One key person said to be staying on is Defense Minister Sebastien Lecornu who is believed to enjoy a close and trusting relationship with Macron.
Barnier was at the Elysee Palace late Thursday to discuss the nominations with Macron.
The list is a government “ready to act in the service of the French people,” the premier’s office said. It later said the new government would be unveiled “before Sunday.”
Macron could seek to veto Barnier’s proposals but doing so would cause immense tensions with his premier at this stage.
Sources added that names still need to be vetted to ensure they have no conflicts of interest before entering government, as is customary.
But Macron “will not censor any name,” said a source close to him asking not to be named.
There had been tensions earlier this week between centrist Macron and Barnier, who comes from the LR, over the balance of the government notably at a lunch earlier this week that reports said was far from cordial.
Le Monde daily said that Barnier had even raised the possibility of resigning just days into the job. But the tensions were then resolved on Thursday.
Politics in France has been deadlocked since the June-July snap legislative elections left it with a hung parliament.
Barnier, the European Union’s former top Brexit negotiator and a right-winger, was appointed earlier this month by Macron in an attempt to breach the impasse.
Key posts were vacant with Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire stepping down after occupying his post since Macron came to power in 2017 and Foreign Minister Stephane Sejourne tapped by Macron to be France’s new EU commissioner.
However there seems to be no place in the cabinet for the ambitious Gerald Darmanin, interior minister since 2020 and who had reportedly long coveted the job of foreign minister.
The 73-year-old Barnier minister has faced a raft of challenges since taking office.
The prime minister had warned on Wednesday that France’s budgetary situation was “very serious.”
France was placed on a formal procedure for violating EU budgetary rules before Barnier was picked as head of government.
Macron had hoped to reassert his relative majority in parliament by calling for the elections in late June and early July, but the plan backfired.
A left-wing alliance nabbed the most seats in the lower house National Assembly, but does not have a working majority.
Macron’s centrist faction is now the second largest bloc.
The far right is third, but the anti-immigration National Rally emerged from the election as the single largest party.


‘Russian NATO’ loses ground in Moscow’s former backyard

‘Russian NATO’ loses ground in Moscow’s former backyard
Updated 20 September 2024

‘Russian NATO’ loses ground in Moscow’s former backyard

‘Russian NATO’ loses ground in Moscow’s former backyard
  • The fate of Collective Security Treaty Organization, an alliance of ex-Soviet states, highlights challenges facing the Kremlin as it seeks to maintain geopolitical sway across Eurasia
  • In July, Central Asian states held their first joint military exercises without Moscow, while Kazakhstan hosted special forces from Pakistan, Qatar and Turkiye for drills in September

BALYKCHY, Kyrgyzstan: Even as Russia stages a series of military drills with its allies in Central Asia, Moscow’s hold over a region it considers its own backyard appears to be growing increasingly tenuous.
Bogged down by its all-out war on Ukraine, now dragging through a third year, Russia is visibly losing its historic role as the key power broker in both Central Asia and the Caucasus.
The fate of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), a military alliance of ex-Soviet states, highlights the challenges facing the Kremlin as it seeks to maintain and advance its geopolitical sway across Eurasia.
Often referred to as a “Russian NATO,” the alliance was formed in 1992 to fill the security vacuum left by the collapse of the Soviet Union.
But three decades on, the bloc is struggling with “serious issues of competitiveness and viability,” Armenian analyst Hakob Badalyan told AFP.
Yerevan is boycotting the organization, though it has remained a formal member.
It accuses the CSTO — and therefore Moscow — of abandoning it amid conflict with arch-foe Azerbaijan.
It is not the first membership challenge faced by the CSTO, which comprises Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, alongside Russia and Armenia.
Baku left in 1999, alongside Caucasus neighbor Georgia. Uzbekistan followed suit in 2012.
Both Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan ignored calls to rejoin the alliance last year.
Russia’s difficulties across Central Asia and the Caucasus stand in contrast to its successes in forging and deepening alliances with the likes of China, India, Iran, North Korea and several African countries amid its invasion of Ukraine.
Badalyan sees those developments as connected.
“At war with Ukraine, Russia has far fewer resources to fully play its role as the CSTO’s military-technical leader,” he said.
The CSTO still has a role to play in the region, others suggested — though the idea of it acting as a powerful Russian alternative to NATO is questionable.
For instance, the alliance intervened in Kazakhstan in 2022, where predominantly Russian “peacekeeping forces” helped quell deadly anti-government riots and stabilize President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s regime.
At the time, Russia and the CSTO positioned themselves as guarantors of stability for allied authoritarian regimes — a scenario that now seems impossible to replicate.
The CSTO’s role in the region has also shifted following the Taliban’s military takeover in Afghanistan in 2021.
According to Vladimir Zharikhin, deputy director of the Russian Institute of CIS Countries, the group has helped by “ensuring the stability of Central Asian countries bordering Afghanistan” over the last three years.
“If there haven’t been any serious conflicts involving Afghanistan and Central Asian nations, it’s largely due to Russian military bases in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan,” he said.
Moscow and its closest ally Minsk hope military drills in Kyrgyzstan last week, and Kazakhstan next week, will show the alliance still has geopolitical relevance.
“By holding these exercises, we show the international community and all our enemies that we are ready to face any threat,” Belarusian official Gennady Lepeshko said in the Kyrgyz town of Balykchy, where last week’s drills took place.
But the alliance appears split even on the definition of who those “enemies” are.
While Russia sees the West as an existential threat, Central Asian states and Armenia are strengthening ties with the United States and Europe.
Aside from Belarus, none have backed Moscow’s war on Ukraine.
And even Minsk — financially, politically, economically and militarily reliant on Moscow — does not recognize Russia’s territorial claims over eastern Ukraine.
Western countries are not blind to the possible geopolitical opening in the region.
This week, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz visited Central Asia, where his hosts urged him to invest in energy and transport infrastructure to connect the region to Europe, bypassing Russia.
In July, Central Asian states held their first joint military exercises without Moscow, while Armenia hosted joined military drills with the United States.
The region is also being courted beyond the West, including militarily.
Kazakhstan hosted special forces from Pakistan, Qatar, and Turkiye for drills in September, held under the banner of “limitless friendship.”
China is expanding its security influence in Central Asia, both through bilateral agreements and its own regional bloc, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.
Drawing on cultural ties with fellow Turkic-speaking nations, Ankara has also boosted arms supplies.
Sensing the challenge, there is little chance of Russian President Vladimir Putin simply accepting his country’s diminished influence in a region it ruled over for decades.
“The time has come to begin a broad discussion on a new system of collective security in Eurasia,” he said back in June.