¶¶Ņõ¶ĢŹÓʵ

Media watchdog urges protection of Israeli journalist facing death threats after pro-Palestine speech

Abrahamā€™s speech was labeled as ā€œantisemiticā€ by several high-ranking German and Israeli officials, including the mayor of Berlin and Israelā€™s ambassador to Germany. (AFP/File)
Abrahamā€™s speech was labeled as ā€œantisemiticā€ by several high-ranking German and Israeli officials, including the mayor of Berlin and Israelā€™s ambassador to Germany. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 01 March 2024

Media watchdog urges protection of Israeli journalist facing death threats after pro-Palestine speech

Media watchdog urges protection of Israeli journalist facing death threats after pro-Palestine speech
  • Yuval Abraham voiced concerns about Gaza situation during award acceptance speech at Berlin Film Festival
  • CPJ coordinator highlights ā€˜atmosphere of self-censorship and anti-press rhetoric in Israelā€™Ā 

LONDON: The Committee to Protect Journalists, a media watchdog, has called on Israeli authorities to ensure the safety of Yuval Abraham and his family, who have been the target of death threats following his speech expressing solidarity with Palestine.

Abraham, an Israeli journalist for +972 magazine and filmmaker, faced criticism from both Israeli and German officials after delivering a speech at the Berlin Film Festival in which he voiced concerns about the situation in Gaza.

CPJ Middle East and North Africa Program Coordinator Sherif Mansour said that he was ā€œdeeply alarmedā€ by the death threats directed at Abraham, and warned of a growing ā€œatmosphere of self-censorship and anti-press rhetoric in Israel, which has been expanding since the Israel-Gaza war.ā€

He added: ā€œIsraeli authorities must ensure the necessary protection for all journalists, regardless of their views, and hold accountable those who threaten journalists and their family members.ā€

Abraham revealed that he had to cancel his flight back to Israel out of fear of being targeted. His family reportedly fled their home at night after a right-wing Israeli group arrived, searching for the journalist and issuing threats.

In his speech, Abraham accused the Israeli government of perpetrating a ā€œmassacre,ā€ and called for an end to the double standards between Israeli and Palestinian citizens.

Standing alongside his Palestinian co-director, Basel Adra, Abraham highlighted the disparities in rights and freedoms between Israelis and Palestinians living in close proximity.

ā€œThis situation of apartheid between us, this inequality, has to end. We need to call for a ceasefire,ā€ Abraham said.

Abraham, who is based mainly in Jerusalem, also criticized German arms sales to Israel.

The speech was labeled as ā€œantisemiticā€ by several high-ranking German and Israeli officials, including the mayor of Berlin and Israelā€™s ambassador to Germany.

Abraham and Adra accepted two awards on Feb. 25 for their documentary ā€œNo Other Land,ā€ which chronicles Israeli authoritiesā€™ evictions and demolitions of Palestinian homes in the occupied West Bank.

Israeli public broadcaster Kan News initially labeled Abrahamā€™s speech as ā€œantisemitic,ā€ a designation that was retracted only following Abrahamā€™s request to the network.

Abraham joins a growing list of Israeli journalists facing physical assault and death threats since the beginning of the conflict last October.

Itamar Cohen, a journalist with Israel-based outlet News 360, faced hostility when Israeli police forcibly removed him from the scene of a stabbing in Jerusalemā€™s Old City, despite his identification as a journalist.

In October, journalist and columnist Israel Frey went into hiding after his home was attacked by a far-right Israeli mob. The attack took place after Frey expressed solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza.


TikTok gets reprieve with Trump order but with twist

TikTok gets reprieve with Trump order but with twist
Updated 21 January 2025

TikTok gets reprieve with Trump order but with twist

TikTok gets reprieve with Trump order but with twist
  • Trump suggested that the US should be a half owner of TikTokā€™s US business in return for keeping the app alive
  • Short video service used by 170 million Americans was briefly taken offline for US users on Saturday

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Monday delaying by 75 days the enforcement of a ban of popular short-video app TikTok that was slated to be shuttered on Jan. 19.
But Trump suggested that the US should be a half owner of TikTokā€™s US business in return for keeping the app alive.
The short video service used by 170 million Americans was briefly taken offline for US users on Saturday, hours before a law that said it must be sold by its Chinese owner ByteDance on national security grounds took effect on Sunday. US officials had said that under ByteDance, there was a risk of Americansā€™ data being misused.
TikTok restored access on Sunday and thanked Trump for providing assurances to TikTok and its business partners that they would not face hefty fines to keep the app running. The app and website were operational on Monday, but TikTok was still not available for download in the Apple and Google app stores.
Trumpā€™s order, signed hours after he was inaugurated on Monday, directs the attorney general to not enforce the law ā€œto permit my administration an opportunity to determine the appropriate course of action with respect to TikTok.ā€
The executive order capped 48 hours of legal maneuvering and political intrigue that left millions of TikTokkers saddened and then elated over the rapidly changing fate of their app.
The debate over TikTok also comes at a tense moment in US-China relations. Trump has said he intends to place tariffs on China but has also indicated he hopes to have more direct contact with Chinaā€™s leader.
While signing the executive order Monday evening, Trump said that he ā€œcould seeā€ the US government taking a 50 percent stake in TikTok and as part of that stake, the US could police the site.
Trump added that if a deal isnā€™t approved by China, ā€œthereā€™s no value. So if we create that value, why arenā€™t we entitled to like half?ā€ He said the company could be worth hundreds of billions of dollars.
Trump did not formally invoke the 90-day delay allowed under the statute, which can only be issued if ByteDance had binding agreements to divest the app within 90 days. He suggested a joint venture as a possibility instead.
It would be unprecedented for the US government to demand an equity stake in a major company in exchange for approving its continued use.
Trumpā€™s comments did not address whether ByteDance or other Chinese entities would be allowed to hold a stake in TikTok or if the deal would address US national security concerns about US user data.
The order directs the Justice Department to issue letters to companies like Apple, Alphabetā€™s Google and Oracle that supply services to TikTok ā€œstating that there has been no violation of the statute and that there is no liability for any conduct that occurred during the above-specified period.ā€ It is still unclear if Trumpā€™s order will be enough for the companies to restore the app to stores in the United States.
ā€œFrankly, we have no choice. We have to save it,ā€ Trump said at a rally on Sunday ahead of his inauguration.
That announcement came as China indicated for the first time it would be open to a transaction keeping TikTok operating in the US
When asked about the appā€™s restoration and Trumpā€™s desire for a deal, Chinaā€™s foreign ministry told a regular news briefing on Monday that it believed companies should ā€œdecide independentlyā€ about their operations and deals.


Missing US journalistā€™s mother says new Syria leaders ā€˜determinedā€™ to find son

Missing US journalistā€™s mother says new Syria leaders ā€˜determinedā€™ to find son
Updated 20 January 2025

Missing US journalistā€™s mother says new Syria leaders ā€˜determinedā€™ to find son

Missing US journalistā€™s mother says new Syria leaders ā€˜determinedā€™ to find son

DAMASCUS: The mother of US journalist Austin Tice, who went missing in Syria in 2012, said on Monday in Damascus that the war-torn country's new leadership was committed to finding him.
Tice was working as a freelance journalist for Agence France-Presse, McClatchy News, The Washington Post, CBS and other media outlets when he was detained at a checkpoint in August 2012.
ā€œI have been privileged to meet with the new leadership of Syria,ā€ Debra Tice told journalists in Damascus, after holding talks with Syriaā€™s new leader Ahmed al-Sharaa.
ā€œIt was so wonderful to learn that they are dedicated and determined to bring home my son, and your son,ā€ she added.
She expressed hope the incoming administration of Donald Trump, who takes office as US president later on Monday, will work to bring her son home.
ā€œToday... Trump will be sworn into office and a page will be turned,ā€ she said.
ā€œI have great hope that the Trump administration will be very engaged in diligent work to bring Austin home.
ā€œI look forward to working closely with the team, including National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and Special Presidential Envoy Adam Logan.ā€
Debra Tice said she was ā€œlooking forwardā€ to engaging with the Trump administration.
ā€œHis people have already reached out to me,ā€ she said.
ā€œI havenā€™t experienced that for the last four years, and so Iā€™m very much looking forward to their help and involvement, and I think theyā€™re going to be quick at it.ā€
Last month, US officials said Syriaā€™s new leadership had assisted in the hunt for Tice, including searches at sites of interest.
ā€œWe feel itā€™s our duty as the US government to press on until we know with certainty what happened to him, where he is and to bring him home,ā€ said Roger Carstens, the US point man on hostages.
He made the remarks during the first visit to Damascus by US officials since Islamist-led forces toppled autocratic Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.


TikTok says itā€™s in the process of restoring service to US users

TikTok says itā€™s in the process of restoring service to US users
Updated 19 January 2025

TikTok says itā€™s in the process of restoring service to US users

TikTok says itā€™s in the process of restoring service to US users
  • TikTok thanks Donald Trump, who says he plans to give TikTokā€™s China-based parent company more time to find an approved buyer
  • Popular video-sharing platform went dark in US in response to new law

NEW YORK: TikTok says itā€™s ā€œin the processā€ of restoring service to users in the United States after the popular video-sharing platform went dark in response to a new law.
The company that runs TikTok said in a post on X on Sunday that tech companies that faced fines if they didnā€™t remove TikTokā€™s app from the digital stores and other service providers had agreed to help.
TikTok thanked President-elect Donald Trump, who on Sunday said he planned to sign an executive order after his inauguration on Monday to give TikTokā€™s China-based parent company more time to find an approved buyer before the popular video-sharing platform is subject to a permanent USban.
It was not immediately clear whether TikTok was working as it did before the company instituted a blackout late Saturday. Some users reported that the app was working, and TikTokā€™s website appeared to be functioning for at least some users. However, the app remained unavailable for download on Appleā€™s app store.
Google and Apple removed the app from their digital stores to comply with a federal law that required them to do so if TikTok parent company ByteDance didnā€™t sell its US operation by Sunday. The law, which passed with wide bipartisan support in April, allowed for steep fines for non-compliance.
TikTok said Trumpā€™s promise of an executive order had provided ā€œthe necessary clarity and assurance to our service providers that they will face no penalties providing TikTok to over 170 million Americans and allowing over 7 million small businesses to thrive.ā€


US Navy veteran evacuating Afghans wins $5m in CNN defamation suit

US Navy veteran evacuating Afghans wins $5m in CNN defamation suit
Updated 18 January 2025

US Navy veteran evacuating Afghans wins $5m in CNN defamation suit

US Navy veteran evacuating Afghans wins $5m in CNN defamation suit
  • The settlement will avert a second phase of the trial that would have determined any punitive damages

WASHINGTON: CNN reached a settlement on Friday with a US Navy veteran who helped evacuate people from Afghanistan after the US military withdrew from the country in 2021, a judge said on Friday, hours after a jury found the TV news outlet liable for defaming him.

The six-person jury decided CNN had to pay damages totaling $5 million. The settlement will avert a second phase of the trial that would have determined any punitive damages. The verdict followed a two-week trial in Panama City, Florida, state court.

Circuit Judge William Henry did not provide details of the deal in announcing the settlement in open court.

Plaintiff Zachary Young sued CNN in 2022, accusing the Warner Bros Discovery unit of destroying his reputation in a segment on ā€œThe Lead with Jake Tapperā€ by branding him as a profiteer who exploited desperate Afghans by charging exorbitant fees.

CNN stood by its story and denied defaming Young, though the network said in March 2022 that it regretted using the term ā€œblack marketā€ to describe Youngā€™s work.

A CNN representative said the network remains proud of its journalists but ā€œwill of course take what useful lessons we can from this case.ā€ The representative declined to offer details of the deal.

Youngā€™s lawyer Vel Freedman said in a statement that he was very pleased to clear Youngā€™s name, obtain punitive damages and settle the case.

Young, wearing a dark suit and blue tie, smiled as Henry thanked the lawyers for their work before dismissing them.

The case stems from Youngā€™s work as a security consultant helping corporations and charities extract people from Afghanistan after the Taliban swiftly took back control following the chaotic US withdrawal.

In a segment on The Lead, CNN said ā€œdesperate Afghansā€ trying to escape the country were being ā€œexploitedā€ with ā€œexorbitantā€ and ā€œimpossibleā€ fees charged for evacuations.

The segment turned to focus on Young, displaying his name and photo next to a chyron saying evacuees faced a perilous ā€œblack market.ā€

ā€œThe sum and substance of the segment states and implies that Young marketed evacuations directly to Afghan citizens, that he exploited Afghan citizens, and that he sold them illegal goods/services on a black market,ā€ Young said in his lawsuit.


TikTok ban: Last-minute reprieve or rule of law?

TikTok ban: Last-minute reprieve or rule of law?
Updated 17 January 2025

TikTok ban: Last-minute reprieve or rule of law?

TikTok ban: Last-minute reprieve or rule of law?
  • As the Jan. 19 deadline looms for TikTokā€™s potential ban in the US, rumors are rife speculating on the future of the video app

DUBAI/LONDON: With just days left until the official ban of Chinese-owned social media platform TikTok is set to take effect in the US, speculation is mounting over what happens next ā€” and whether there could still be a last-minute twist.

The short answer: No one knows for certain.

In March 2024, the US House of Representatives passed a bill that, if signed into law, would force ByteDance, the China-based owner of TikTok, to sell the video-sharing app. The Senate passed the bill, and President Joe Biden signed it, ordering ByteDance to sell TikTok to an American company or face a ban in the US by Jan. 19.

At the time, TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew said that such a law ā€œwill take billions of dollars out of the pockets of creators and small businessesā€ and put more than 30,000 American jobs at risk.

Neither he nor the company were willing to give up without a fight. In May 2024, TikTok and ByteDance sued the US federal government challenging the law, alleging that it was unconstitutional.

In December, a federal appeals court ruled the TikTok law was constitutional. A month later, on Jan. 10, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a pivotal case brought by TikTok and its users challenging the law on the basis of US usersā€™ First Amendment rights.

On Friday, the Supreme Court upheld the TikTok ban after days of speculation, during which it refrained from making public comments on the case, leaving a sliver of hope for a last-minute reprieve. With the decision now confirmed, TikTokā€™s options have significantly narrowed.

In its ruling, the court stated: ā€œWe conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate petitionersā€™ First Amendment rights. The judgment of the United States court of appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is affirmed.ā€

This decision means TikTok will no longer be available for download from app stores starting Jan. 19.

ā€œThere is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source of community. But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTokā€™s data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary,ā€ the ruling reads.

The outcome seemed increasingly likely during the hearings, with Justice Elena Kagan saying: ā€œThe law is only targeted at this foreign corporation that doesn't have First Amendment rights. Whatever effect it has, it has.ā€

Justice Amy Coney Barrett added: ā€œThe law doesnā€™t say TikTok has to shut down. It says ByteDance has to divest.ā€

Amid the legal back and forth, TikTokā€™s knight in shining armor might just be President-elect Donald Trump, who is set to take office on Jan. 20 ā€” one day after the purported ban.

Despite trying to ban the app during his first term over national security concerns, he joined TikTok during his 2024 presidential campaign, during which he pledged to ā€œsave TikTok.ā€ He also lauded the platform for helping him win more youth votes.

When asked about his policies on social media regulation, particularly the impending ban of TikTok, Karoline Leavitt, Trump-Vance Transition Team spokeswoman, told Arab News: ā€œThe American people re-elected President Trump by a resounding margin, giving him a mandate to implement the promises he made on the campaign trail. He will deliver.ā€

Just last month, Trump urged the Supreme Court to pause the ban.

The brief submitted to the court says Trump ā€œalone possesses the consummate dealmaking expertise, the electoral mandate, and the political will to negotiate a resolution to save the platform while addressing the national security concerns expressed by the Government.ā€

Moreover, earlier this week, reports emerged that TikTok CEO Chew has been invited to Trumpā€™s inauguration and offered a ā€œposition of honor,ā€ suggesting a willingness to engage with the company.

And Mike Waltz, Trumpā€™s incoming national security adviser, told FOX News that the new administration would ā€œfind a way to preserve (TikTok) but protect peopleā€™s data.ā€

Any intervention by Trump, however, would likely take the form of an executive order temporarily pausing the ban, contingent on TikTok demonstrating progress toward separating from ByteDance. Even then, such an order could face legal challenges, and the law only allows a limited delay of 60 to 90 days to give extra time for negotiations.

Outgoing President Biden, who will leave office on Jan. 19, will not enforce a ban on TikTok, a US official said Thursday, leaving its fate in the hands of Trump.

Rumors of a potential sale have intensified in recent days including speculation of interest from high-profile buyers, such as Elon Musk, but ByteDance dismissed these reports as ā€œpure fiction.ā€

The company has consistently rejected the possibility of a sale, saying it ā€œis simply not possible: not commercially, not technologically, not legally.ā€

As the Jan. 19 deadline approaches, the situation remains shrouded in uncertainty, even after Fridayā€™s ruling.

For now, TikTokā€™s chances of remaining accessible in the US appear practically null, as the case is steeped in complex issues of politics, national security, economic interests, and digital rights.

The law underpinning the ban targets a wide network of US-based partners that facilitate TikTokā€™s operations, effectively making common workarounds, such as using virtual private networks or changing a phoneā€™s regional settings, either ineffective or impractical, according to experts.

At best, users might gain limited access to a web-based version of the app, which lacks many of its features. However, even that option may not function reliably, experts warned.

The most likely enforcement mechanism would involve compelling app stores like Google Play and Appleā€™s App Store to remove TikTok from their platforms in the US. Lawmakers have already instructed tech companies to prepare for this scenario if the ban is enacted.

If the app is banned, TikTok reportedly plans to display a pop-up message for users attempting to access the platform, directing them to a website with information about the ban, according to a Reuters report citing sources close to the matter.

For now, TikTokā€™s operations continue as usual, with the company having reassured employees that their jobs are secure regardless of the Supreme Courtā€™s decision. However, morale within the company is said to be low, despite these reassurances.

What is certain is that TikTokā€™s leadership has been ā€œplanning for various scenarios.ā€ With Fridayā€™s decision now final and the Jan. 19 ban imminent, the companyā€™s next steps will likely take one of two paths: intervention by Trump or divestment to a non-Chinese entity.

Meanwhile, users and critics alike wait in anticipation, seeking clarity on the far-reaching consequences of the ban ā€” potentially rippling as far as the Middle East ā€” and whether any last-minute developments might offer a reprieve for the platform and its millions of US users.