LONDON: Washington is debating whether to strike militarily against Damascus following multiple reports it has used chemical weapons against civilians, according to US officials.
US President Donald Trump launched airstrikes in Syria last April against the Shayrat air base after Damascus killed more than 80 people in the opposition-held town of Khan Sheikhun using sarin or a sarin-like substance, according to a subsequent UN report.
The Trump administration has drawn a 鈥渞ed line鈥� over the use of sarin gas. Damascus is reported to have intensified defensive measures including the deployment of Russian army units in key locations in anticipation of a US attack.
But US officials have referred to the 鈥渓ack of evidence鈥� that Damascus has used sarin since the Khan Sheikhun attack 鈥渢herefore, striking Syria for using chlorine will lead to lowering the red line and will force Washington to respond on several occasions.鈥�
鈥淚n addition to that, it will lead to a strategic change in the military balance and Damascus may use this to justify carrying out more operations against the opposition,鈥� the official said.
Damascus and Moscow have repeatedly denied the use of chemical weapons and accused the opposition of doing so.
There have been several reports of chemical weapons including chlorine and sarin being used by Damascus this year, including in the besieged enclave of eastern Ghouta. Nikki Haley, US ambassador to the UN, told the Security Council on March 12 that if the 15-member body failed to act on Syria, then Washington 鈥渞emains prepared to act if we must.鈥�
鈥� This article appeared in Asharq Al-Awsat on March 19